Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Russia not so strong says Fitch (FT Alphaville)

Russia not so strong says Fitch

Oct 22 15:05
by Izabella Kaminska

The great emerging markets sell-off continues with Hungary, Turkey, Poland and Argentina taking starring roles. Ukraine and Belarus meanwhile are both in talks for IMF loans. But how are things looking for Russia?

Not so good according to Fitch:

…despite the sovereign’s strong balance sheet and liquidity position, the impact of the global financial crisis and sharp drop in oil prices has brought Fitch’s long-standing concerns over Russia’s relatively weak banking sector, commodity dependence and heavy private sector external repayment schedule to the fore, exposing weaknesses in Russia’s economic and credit fundamentals. “Trends in external refinancing and oil prices and measures being taken by the authorities to support the private sector will have an adverse impact on the sovereign balance sheet.

Russia’s exceptionally strong sovereign balance sheet underpins its rating, notably the buffer provided by foreign exchange reserves of USD531bn - the third largest in the world. This allows the policy authorities to provide the Russian corporate and banking sector with US dollar liquidity and financing without imperilling its own credit quality.

But:

Russia is also facing a second negative external shock - the recent sharp fall in commodity prices - which combined with falling inflows of foreign capital, will lower economic growth and pressure the credit quality of Russian banks and companies.

So while Russia’s sovereign status is likely to withstand any shocks, the private sector remains exposed. Shares have responded accordingly.

The fear is that the Russian private sector, which borrowed heavily from international capital markets to fund aggressive expansion at home and overseas, could make Russian markets very vulnerable.

Fitch estimates Russian banks and companies face some $80bn of medium- and long-term amortisation next year and the CBR estimates that total foreign debt payments due in the final quarter of this year are up to $40bn.

Already gas giant Gazprom, which only today reported a record Q1 profit of $10.1bn, said it may have trouble obtaining new loans and refinancing debts.

Bloomberg writes:

Gazprom and its subsidiaries have $55 billion in outstanding bonds and loans, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The company is scheduled to repay $6.6 billion next year and $12.5 billion in 2010, the data show. The energy producer has already said it’s reviewing its spending program amid tightening credit markets and lower revenue expectations. It has laid out plans to spend more than $30 billion this year on new projects as output drops at mature fields in western Siberia.

Among those banks “aggressively” expanded into foreign markets is VTB, Russia’s second biggest lender. It owns banks across western Europe, including Germany, Austria and the UK. Today VTB said it plans to spend some $500m supporting its foreign units writes Reuters.

Read More...

Defaults, revisited (FT alphaville)

Defaults, revisited

Oct 22 13:20
by Sam Jones

On Tuesday we noted the current chaos in fixed-income and CDS markets which seems yet to have worked through into equity.

With severe recession now firmly on the horizon, bond markets are anticipating a huge surge in default rates. The broad consensus is that junk rated credits will fare, relatively speaking, worse. One commenter noted on the site yesterday:

…there has been rating deterioration across the board over the last decade, it has been more pronounced in sub-investment grade. Investment grade is still typically single and A, but sub-investment grade now means single B whereas it used to mean BB.

And indeed, it’s the itraxx Crossover index which is seeing some of the most dramatic moves right now, compared to the investment grade iTraxx Europe. The Crossover is currently at an all time wide:

iTraxx

The big moves in the iTraxx crossover index are interesting when seen historically, rebased against moves made by the iTraxx Europe:

Relatively speaking, the iTraxx crossover and iTraxx Europe indices have diverged quite markedly - to the casual observer it looks like there is something of a correlation crisis at work. Either one of the indices was mispriced or one of them is mispriced.

1. It may be that, looking backwards, just as too many AAA structured finance bonds were thought too safe (and thus paid too little) so investment-grade corporates were “overrated” and are now being proved to be actually much riskier. The investment grade iTraxx Europe, which has never existed through a recession, is thus adjusting to a more historically accurate correlation between it and the junk-grade crossover.

2. The IG index also contains a large number of financials: you might consider what’s going on in this whole sector an idiosyncratic event, and thus likely to pull the IG index out of historical line.

3. Or it may be that the iTraxx Europe is the correctly priced index, and it’s the Crossover which will have to adjust.

The crisis in financials has indeed been behind the “disproportionate” rise in the iTraxx Europe, but to tackle point 2, the trouble in that sector is not an idiosyncratic issue but a systemic one: one which will spread.

Defaults/rising default risk in financials should be seen as a precursor to a wave of defaults elsewhere. Only in the coming months will the real effects of the crunch start to be felt on the broader economy, and with it, the broader corporate universe: to which the iTraxx Crossover is most exposed. Assuming then, some kind of historical correlation between the two indices still holds, the Crossover will move much wider yet.
_____

There might be a third take. A bit of a get out, but no less relevant. The modelling and pricing assumptions around CDS and CDS indices - both iTraxx Europe and Crossover - are totally inadequate in the current crisis.

Default modelling has relied on historical data going back, typically, over the past twenty years. The last banking crisis like this that we faced was in 1930.

The pricing of credit is broken.

Read More...

CDS REPORT: European emerging sovereigns under pressure (FT Alphaville)

CDS REPORT: European emerging sovereigns under pressure

Oct 22 12:17
by David Oakley

European emerging market credits came under pressure on Wednesday as risk aversion continued to plague the financial system.

With the International Monetary Fund considering bailouts for Ukraine, Turkey, Hungary, and Serbia, these countries’ credit default swaps widened further because of the growing perception of risk in investing in these so-called high-yielding nations.

Ukraine, which is expected to seal a deal of between $10bn and $50bn with the IMF soon, has seen its CDS price rise to record levels, with bid-offer spreads very wide, reflecting the illiquidity in this market.

The latest CDS bid-offer spread on Ukraine was 1,793bp to 2,093bp. Every 1bp is equal to a cost of 1,000 euros to insure 10m euros of debt over five years.

Nigel Rendell, senior emerging markets strategist at RBS Capital Markets, said: “You can drive a bus through these spreads, they are so wide - and a bendy bus at that.”

Other countries that have seen CDS prices rise sharply this week include Hungary, which is trading at around 520bp, up around 50bp since the start of the week, Serbia, which has a price of around 450bp, and Turkey, which has a price around 700bp.

Traders are no longer quoting CDS prices on Iceland, which has in effect defaulted and is also awaiting on the IMF to help kickstart its hobbled economy.

The IMF is considering rescue packages for all these countries, which have high current account deficits and weakening economies.

Separately, the iTraxx Crossover index, which is made up of 50 mainly high-yield credits and is considered the best gauge of sentiment, was trading around 780bp, close to the Tuesday close.

Read More...

Argentina Default Looms as Pension Funds Seizure Roils Markets (Bloomberg)

Argentina Default Looms as Pension Funds Seizure Roils Markets

By James Attwood and Bill Faries

Oct. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Argentina's planned seizure of $29 billion of private pension funds stoked concern the nation is headed for its second default in a decade.

Investors say President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner's decision may further hurt markets already reeling from slumping commodity prices and slower growth. The retirement system, set up in 1994 to help bolster capital markets, owns about 5 percent of companies listed on the Buenos Aires stock exchange and 27 percent of shares available for public trading, data compiled by pension funds show.

Argentine bond yields soared above 24 percent before the announcement late yesterday, and the benchmark Merval stock index tumbled 11 percent. The last time the government sought to tap workers' savings to help finance debt payments was in 2001, just before it stopped servicing $95 billion of obligations.

``It's the final of many nails in the coffin from an institutional investor perspective,'' Bill Rudman, who helps manage $3 billion of emerging-market equity at WestLB Mellon Asset Management in London. Argentina is ``disappearing into irrelevance.''

The government's proposal to take control of 10 funds, including units of London-based HSBC Holdings Plc and Bilbao, Spain-based Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA, still needs congressional approval. Fernandez said yesterday her decision is ``in a context where the biggest countries'' are taking steps to protect their banks because of the global financial crisis.

``Instead, we're taking them for our retirees and workers,'' she said during a rally in Buenos Aires.

Borrowing Needs

Argentina's borrowing needs will swell to as much as $14 billion next year from $7 billion in 2008, RBC Capital Markets, a Toronto-based unit of Canada's largest bank, said yesterday.

South America's second-largest economy hasn't had access to international capital markets since its 2001 default. Holders of about $20 billion of defaulted bonds rejected the government's 2005 payout of 30 cents on the dollar, and Fernandez has said she's considering proposals to offer a new deal.

The cost of protecting Argentina's bonds against default soared yesterday, as five-year credit-default swaps based on Argentina's debt jumped 2.38 percentage points to 32 percentage points, according to Bloomberg data. The contracts to protect against or speculate on default pay the buyer face value should a borrower fail to adhere to its debt agreements.

The proposed takeover ``makes the chance of default in the short-term less likely by inflicting immense damage to the long- term credibility of the government and the financial system with its own people,'' said Paul McNamara, who helps manage $1.2 billion of emerging-market assets at Augustus Asset Managers Ltd. in London.

Investment Mix

Amado Boudou, the head of Argentina's social security administration, said yesterday the government will keep the same investment mix for the funds, with 60 percent in bonds and 10 percent in stocks. He called the privately run system an ``enormous error.''

Currently, about 55 percent of the 94.4 billion pesos ($29.3 billion) held by the private pension funds is invested in government debt, according to the pension regulator's Web site. A takeover would allow the Fernandez administration to write off the sovereign bonds held by the funds, said Javier Salvucci, an analyst with Buenos Aires-based Silver Cloud Advisors.

``It's a short-term fix that may cause more fiscal and macro pain in the long haul, which has been typical of the last two administrations,'' said Will Landers, who manages $5 billion in Latin American equities at BlackRock Inc.

Volume Quadrupled

Since the pension system began in 1994, trading volume on the Buenos Aires stock exchange has quadrupled. The funds were net buyers of domestic equities for a third straight month in September, investing about $144 million, according to Deutsche Bank AG. They have about $4.1 billion in domestic stocks, strategist Guilherme Paiva wrote in an Oct. 15 note.

The government's plan is ``one additional factor to count against Argentine assets,'' said Vinicius Silva, an emerging market strategist at New York-based Morgan Stanley, which recommends that emerging-market equity investors have a ``zero' weighting in the country.

Nestor Kirchner, Fernandez's husband and predecessor as president, began tightening restrictions on private pension funds last year, requiring them to keep more investments in the country to sustain economic growth. The rules forced the funds to ``repatriate'' about $3 billion in mostly Brazilian assets, Sebastian Palla, chairman of the country's pension fund association, said in February.

Fund Sales

Foreign emerging-market funds sold about $250 million in Argentine stocks through August this year in the biggest outflow since 2000, according to fund flow tracker EPFR Global in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The Merval is down 51 percent this year compared with 39 percent for the Bovespa in neighboring Brazil.

Bond markets also have tumbled. Yields on the government's 8.28 percent bonds due in 2033 have almost tripled to 24.69 percent from 8.83 percent a year ago.

Seven years ago, as the government tried in vain to stave off a debt default, it pressured the pension funds to participate in bond swaps that pushed forward repayment dates. That December, strapped for cash to pay salaries, it ordered the funds to transfer $3.2 billion in bank deposits to state-owned Banco de la Nacion.

The latest move is ``much, much worse,'' said McNamara at Augustus Asset Managers Ltd.

``It's not just shoving a little bit of debt in at the edge, it's taking over the whole system,'' he said. ``It does even more damage to the concept of encouraging people to invest in the domestic financial industry.''

To contact the reporters on this story: James Attwood in Santiago at jattwood3@bloomberg.netBill Faries in Buenos Aires wfaries@bloomberg.net

Read More...

Dancing the Gas "Troika"


Oct 22 09:58
by Izabella Kaminska

Talk of a natural-gas alliance is officially back.

Following high-level talks in Tehran, Iran, Qatar and Russia are to forge a so-called “Gas Troika”.

This sort of chatter has been around before, everytime causing a corresponding level of panic about a potential Opec-style grip on natural gas prices. Witness, the Times today:
We need not worry that Russia is about to join the oily club. Today’s visit by Abdullah al-Badri is a formality, but the talk of a gas cartel is a different matter. A combination of leading gas exporters, no matter how tentative, could pose a serious economic threat to Europe. We should first discount the hoopla from Gholam Hossein Nozari, the Iranian Oil Minister, who proclaimed yesterday that the talks between Russia, Iran and Qatar had reached ‘a consensus to set up a gas Opec’.

Or the WSJ (our emphasis):

Iran, Qatar and Russia have agreed to form an OPEC-style organization for gas-exporting countries, Iran’s oil minister said Tuesday after a trilateral meeting in Tehran.

That’s all very well, but there is an important distinction to be made between a “gas troika” and an Opec-style cartel. A true Opec-style union is many years aways. In fact most gas market specialists would say it’s currently almost an impossibility.

For one, nat gas does not trade like oil. It is locked to specific pipeline routes and/or transported in liquefied form as LNG. Both are contracted out in long-term deals, leaving very little to trade in an effective spot market.

Without a viable spot market it would be very hard to control day-to-day prices. What’s more natural gas prices are extremely seasonal, and can spike on a day’s notice if there’s a cold snap.

While you can trade the arb between Europe, the US and Asia, on the whole each market also follows its own, very unique, fundamentals.

All that said, a close cooperation between the three, which collectively represent some 56 per cent of the world’s known reserves according to the BP Statistical Review of World Energy, could make a difference in deciding long-term contracts and future investment strategies. But, these sorts of decisions would still take years to feed-through.

For the time being, Russia’s best policy to control prices is still the old, hardly subtle, tap-turning.

Read More...

Oil Dip

Oil dip

Oct 22 07:57
by Tracy Alloway

Crude oil prices have fallen to about $67 a barrel from their record summer highs of about $146, as concerns of slowing economies filter into the commodities market. But, even with that drop, the market is signalling further declines, according to analysts at Merrill Lynch.

ML analysts are looking at WTI crude oil options — where the number of implied vol for OTM puts is trading at much higher levels than for OTM calls. In other (English)words, more downside.
As of last close the options market is pricing in a probability of crude oil prices being in the $45 to $55 per barrel range by Dec. 16, 2008 that is seven times higher than the one based on past historical returns over a similar timeframe (see below) — that seems incredibly bearish given that Opec appears hellbent on cutting production this Friday.

Implied probability of WTI prices


Oil cartel divided over level of cuts

Oct 22 04:54
by Tracy Alloway

Opec is expected on Friday to decide to slash production as the oil cartel faces its biggest test in more than a decade. Newly released data reveal that the cartel’s vastly divergent economic circumstances will make the divided group’s decision of how much to cut even more difficult. Consultants PFC Energy calculated that Opec countries need next year’s oil prices to be anywhere from $10 to $100 to keep their import expenditures and export revenues in balance. Estimates by energy ministers of how much Opec will have to cut range from 500,000 barrels a day to 2.5m.

Read More...